I'm going to keep this one as short and to the point as possible. I will preface this by saying that I do not know who is doing the lying, and am not placing the blame on any one person. I am not saying that anyone has conspired to commit murder, this is not a conspiracy theory about murder, this is PROOF that, no matter what happened, your Government, and your Media, are LYING TO YOU.
Right now there's a lot of things floating out there from LIBOR connections, to medical examiner videos not corroborating, but for me, this is the big one. The big big one. This is the one that makes you go "Whoah!" Before we discuss the video, let's insert a few quotes:
"Connecticut school shooter used assault rifle, had many bullets" - LA Times
"Assault rifle used during Sandy Hook massacre" - CBSNews
"Rifle Used in Killings, America’s Most Popular, Highlights Regulation Debate" - NYTimes
I could keep going for a long time, but I think anyone who doesn't live under a rock has heard the same thing from countless other main stream sources. And this is the rifle they continue to refer to when they say "Military grade assault rifle"
Now, as any person with the most infantile knowledge of guns can tell you - an AR15 is *NOT* a military grade firearm. It is a civilian grade firearm. It is the civilian model of a military firearm better known as the M16. What's the difference?
 |
| Bushmaster AR15 |
Well, there are several, but among the greatest is that the MILITARY version, the M16, can be semi-auto, full-auto, or burst fire.
The AR15 is semi-automatic. Not full auto. Therefore, the AR15 is *NOT* an assault weapon (There is *NO SUCH CLASSIFICATION for Assault Weapon. It is a pejorative invented by the gun grabbing authoritarians to inflict fear in the minds of the uneducated) and it is most certainly not an assault RIFLE, a prerequisite for an assault RIFLE is full-auto capabilities.
So there, they're lying to you about that. But that could really be chalked up to idiot reporters just not doing their jobs and just taking queues from their friends in Government. But that's not even the tip of this ice berg.
Police reports, and initial news reports, said that the "AR15" was recovered from Lanza's trunk. That was breaking news, and as you'll soon see, there were a lot of "mistakes" made by the media during this hour or so of breaking coverage, before someone set them straight on what they were supposed to be saying. Don't believe me?
Let's start with the above video. I wish it wasn't done on a camcorder, and quite frankly I don't have the time right now to go through and put one together myself, but it still gets to the point very quickly. The point is that the media has told us yet another lie.
According to The WSJ:
A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff.Or the New York Times
“No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”
His mother, Nancy kept their home in Newtown, a prosperous, hilly enclave of spacious, newer homes about five miles from the elementary school where she taught kindergarten. Adam Lanza is thought to have been living in the house, too.Or the Washington Post
His parents, Nancy and Peter Lanza, separated about a decade ago, and his mother, a kindergarten teacher at Sandy Hook, remained in the family’s home with her sons, Adam and Ryan Lanza, according Ryan Kraft, now 25, who was a neighbor.
But it's just strange that the Newton School District Website does not list Lanza as a teacher or administrator in the district school system.
And, according to the Associated Press:
A law enforcement official speaking on condition of anonymity said investigators believe Lanza attended the school several years ago but appeared to have no recent connection to the place.
At least one parent said Lanza’s mother was a substitute teacher there. But her name did not appear on a staff list. And the law enforcement official said investigators were unable to establish any connection so far between her and the school.
So if there is no connection that can be established - why are our media reporting that there is? What is there to hide? What is their reason for lying to us? But as bad as that is - as you'll see - it's about to get a whole lot worse, as we shift gears back towards the so called "assault weapon" that the media is drooling over.
NBC first reported that the "Assault Rifle" had been found in the trunk and that 2 handguns had been used to commit the murders. They later recanted and said that 4 handguns had been used to commit the murders, but maintained that the rifle had still been recovered from the trunk...as we see here, officers removing the weapon from the trunk. It's hard to tell exactly what it is, since the video is crap quality - but you can tell that it is ABSOLUTELY NOT an AR15 by the way the officer operates the charging handle. Charging handles on AR15's are in the rear. This firearm has the charging handle in front of the ejection port, just like an Saiga 12...A few other guns have those characteristics, but none of them have that distinct shape...and the projectice that can be seen being ejected by the officer is most certainly not a 7.62 or .223. It's way too big. Almost positive it's a 12 gauge shell.
I suppose one could chalk that up to journalistic stupidity...but when adding it to the other lies...we have to ask ourselves "Why"
Add to that, a video of a so called medical examiner who claims that all of the wounds on the victims were caused by "the long weapon" (skip ahead to 1:34 to hear him say it, but watch the whole video to see his eerily disturbing demeanor and make a judgement for yourself)
NBC first reported that the "Assault Rifle" had been found in the trunk and that 2 handguns had been used to commit the murders. They later recanted and said that 4 handguns had been used to commit the murders, but maintained that the rifle had still been recovered from the trunk...as we see here, officers removing the weapon from the trunk. It's hard to tell exactly what it is, since the video is crap quality - but you can tell that it is ABSOLUTELY NOT an AR15 by the way the officer operates the charging handle. Charging handles on AR15's are in the rear. This firearm has the charging handle in front of the ejection port, just like an Saiga 12...A few other guns have those characteristics, but none of them have that distinct shape...and the projectice that can be seen being ejected by the officer is most certainly not a 7.62 or .223. It's way too big. Almost positive it's a 12 gauge shell.
I suppose one could chalk that up to journalistic stupidity...but when adding it to the other lies...we have to ask ourselves "Why"
Add to that, a video of a so called medical examiner who claims that all of the wounds on the victims were caused by "the long weapon" (skip ahead to 1:34 to hear him say it, but watch the whole video to see his eerily disturbing demeanor and make a judgement for yourself)
So, let's recap real fast. Medical Examiner says killing done with the .223. News reports the .223 was found in the trunk, which appears to be backed up by video evidence (Though it is definitely not an AR15)
But we're being told two different stories from the exact same group of people, and neither of those stories match up. My question is simply "Why"
And why all of the other lies?
There's lots of other stuff to cover, but that'll have to wait for another day. These inconsistencies are too much to ignore. Someone is lying to us and the "who" is less important than the "why"
0 comments:
Post a Comment